πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ NGSS Β· Grades 6-8

MS-LS4-2: Anatomical evidence of relatedness

MS-LS4-2 explained: using anatomical similarities in living and fossil organisms to infer evolutionary relationships, with examples and practice questions.

NGSS performance expectation MS-LS4-2

Students who demonstrate understanding can: Apply scientific ideas to construct an explanation for the anatomical similarities and differences among modern organisms and between modern and fossil organisms to infer evolutionary relationships.

Clarification statement: Emphasis is on explanations of the evolutionary relationships among organisms in terms of similarity or differences of the gross appearance of anatomical structures.

Grade band
Grades 6-8
Discipline
Life science
Topic
Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity

Official wording from the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, 2013). NGSS is a registered trademark of WestEd. Neither WestEd nor the lead states and partners that developed the NGSS were involved in the production of this page, and they do not endorse it. View on nextgenscience.org

What MS-LS4-2 means

Compare a human arm, a bat wing, a whale flipper and a cat's front leg. They do very different jobs, yet inside each one is the same basic arrangement: one upper bone, two lower bones, a cluster of wrist bones and finger bones. Structures like these, built on the same plan, are evidence that the organisms share a common ancestor. The more anatomical features two organisms share, the more closely related they are likely to be.

Students apply this idea to construct explanations about relationships among modern organisms and between modern and fossil organisms. A fossil whale with small hind legs, for example, links modern whales to land-dwelling ancestors. Differences matter too: over many generations, a shared structure can be modified for flying, swimming or running.

The emphasis is on the gross appearance of anatomical structures, the bones and body parts you can see and compare, rather than on molecules or DNA.

Students should be able to

  • Identify similar bone structures in the limbs of different vertebrates.
  • Explain how shared anatomical structures provide evidence of common ancestry.
  • Use similarities and differences in body structures to infer which organisms are most closely related.
  • Compare fossil and modern organisms to infer evolutionary relationships.
  • Explain how a structure inherited from a common ancestor can be modified for different functions.

Common misconceptions

Similar function means close relationship

A bird wing and an insect wing both allow flight but are built very differently. Relatedness is judged by underlying structure, not by what the part does.

Humans evolved from modern apes

Humans and other apes share a common ancestor that lived long ago. No living species is the ancestor of another living species.

Differences rule out a relationship

Related organisms can look very different because shared structures have been modified over many generations for different ways of life.

Model explanation: whales and land mammals

Modern whales have flippers and tiny, unattached hip bones. A fossil animal had four legs, a long tail and a skull shape like a whale's. Explain what these features suggest.

  1. Whale flippers contain the same arm bone pattern as land mammals: one upper bone, two lower bones and many finger bones.
  2. Small hip bones in modern whales match the hips of animals that walk on hind legs, even though whales have no hind legs to use.
  3. The fossil shares the whale skull shape but has four legs, so it fits as an intermediate form.
  4. Together these anatomical features suggest that whales share a common ancestor with land mammals and their bodies changed over many generations.

Answer: Shared limb and hip structures, plus a whale-like fossil with legs, are evidence that whales are related to land mammals through a common ancestor.

Teaching MS-LS4-2

Give students labeled outline drawings of several vertebrate forelimbs and have them color-code matching bones. Then show a structure with a similar function but a different build, such as an insect wing, to sharpen the difference between structure and function.

Assessment asks for explanations of relationships using gross anatomy, so require students to name the specific shared feature they are using as evidence.

5 practice questions

Original questions written for this standard. Choose an option or type your answer, then press Check. Every question has a worked explanation.

Score: 0 / 5(0 of 5 checked)
  1. 1.

    A human arm, a bat wing and a whale flipper have the same basic bone pattern. What does this suggest?

    Question 1 options
    Answer and explanation

    Answer: D) They share a common ancestor

    The same underlying structure is evidence of inheritance from a shared ancestor.

  2. 2.

    Which pair is most likely to be closely related, based on anatomy?

    Question 2 options
    Answer and explanation

    Answer: A) A wolf and a dog, which share very similar skeletons

    Wolves and dogs share nearly identical skeletal structures. The other pairs share function or shape, not underlying structure.

  3. 3.

    Structures with the same basic plan inherited from a common ancestor are called what kind of structures?

    Answer and explanation

    Answer: homologous (also accepted: homologous structures)

    Homologous structures share an underlying plan because of common ancestry.

  4. 4.

    A fossil has features of both reptiles and birds, such as teeth and feathers. How do scientists use it?

    Question 4 options
    Answer and explanation

    Answer: C) As evidence linking birds to reptile-like ancestors

    Fossils with mixed features help show how groups are related.

  5. 5.

    Why can related organisms have limbs that look very different?

    Question 5 options
    Answer and explanation

    Answer: D) The shared structure was modified over many generations for different uses

    Common structures were adapted for flying, swimming or running over time.

Builds on

Leads to

Teach MS-LS4-2

Make a lesson on MS-LS4-2

A full lesson with slides, activities and an exit ticket on anatomical evidence of relatedness, pitched to grades 6-8 and editable in PowerPoint or Google Slides.

Make a lesson β†’

Make a worksheet

A printable, differentiated worksheet on MS-LS4-2 with an answer key, ready in about a minute.

Make a worksheet β†’

Build a self-marking test

Turn anatomical evidence of relatedness into a quiz students answer online that marks itself, with a class summary for you.

Build a test β†’

FAQ

Does MS-LS4-2 include DNA evidence?

No. The emphasis is on similarities and differences in the gross appearance of anatomical structures.

Can fossils be used for MS-LS4-2?

Yes. The standard includes comparisons between modern organisms and between modern and fossil organisms.

More life science standards

MS-LS1-1: Living things are made of cellsMS-LS1-2: How cell parts work togetherMS-LS1-3: Body systems working togetherMS-LS1-4: Behaviors and structures that aid reproductionMS-LS1-5: Genes, environment and growthMS-LS1-6: Photosynthesis, matter and energyMS-LS1-7: Food, new molecules and energy releaseMS-LS1-8: Senses, signals and memoryMS-LS2-1: Resources and populationsMS-LS2-2: Patterns of interaction in ecosystems
All Middle school science standards β†’Standards home β†’